Post From TNT By Big E 13B With Member Comments / Feedback
Why Most Gold Bugs Are Dead Wrong By JIM RICKARDS
EDITOR, JIM RICKARDS’ STRATEGIC INTELLIGENCE on MAY 16, 2015
Editor’s Note: In today’s Weekend Edition… an exposé on why one of the most persistent story lines among gold bugs is dead wrong. It was originally published in the May issue of Jim Rickards’ Strategic Intelligence.
Editor Jim Rickards is a financial lawyer and hedge fund manager. He is also the author of New York Times bestsellers Currency Wars and The Death of Money.
Why Most Gold Bugs Are Dead Wrong By Jim Rickards, editor, Jim Rickards’ Strategic Intelligence
One of the most persistent story lines among gold bugs and market participants who foresee the collapse of the dollar goes something like this: China and many emerging markets including the other BRICS are looking for a way out of the global fiat currency system.
That system is dominated today by the U.S. dollar. This dollar dominance allows the U.S. to force certain kinds of behavior in foreign policy and energy markets. Countries that don’t comply with U.S. wishes find themselves frozen out of global payment systems and find their banks unable to transact in dollars for needed imports or to get paid for their exports.
Russia, Iran, and Syria have all been subjected to this treatment recently. China does not like this system any more than Russia or Iran but is unwilling to confront the U.S. head-on. Instead, China is quietly accumulating massive amounts of gold and building alternative financial institutions such as the Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank, AIIB, and the BRICS-sponsored New Development Bank, NDB.
When the time is right, China will suddenly announce its actual gold holdings to the world and simultaneously turn its back on the Bretton Woods institutions such as the IMF and World Bank.
China will back its currency with its own gold and use the AIIB and NDB and other institutions to lead a new global financial order. Russia and others will be invited to join the Chinese in this new international monetary system.
As a result, the dollar will collapse, the price of gold will skyrocket, and China will be the new global financial hegemon. The gold bugs will live happily ever after. The only problem with this story is that the most important parts of it are wrong.
As usual, the truth is much more intriguing than the popular version. Here’s what’s really going on. As with most myths, parts of the story are true. China is secretly acquiring thousands of tons of gold. China is creating new multilateral lending institutions.
No doubt, China will announce an upward revision in its official gold holdings sometime in the next year or so. In fact, Bloomberg News reported on April 20, 2015, under the headline “The Mystery of China’s Gold Stash May Soon Be Solved,” that “China may be preparing to update its disclosed holdings…” But the reasons for the acquisition of gold and the updated disclosures, if they happen, are not the ones the blogosphere believes.
China is not trying to destroy the old boys’ club — they are trying to join it. China understands that despite the strong growth and huge size of its economy, the yuan is not ready to be a true reserve currency and will not be ready for years to come.
It is true that usage of the yuan is increasing in international transactions. But it is still used for less than 2% of global payments, compared with over 40% for the U.S. dollar.
Usage in payments is only one indicium of a true reserve currency, and not the most important one. The key to being a reserve currency is not payments but investments. There needs to be a deep, liquid bond market denominated in the reserve currency.
That way, when countries earn the target currency in trade, they have someplace to invest their surplus. Right now, if you earn yuan trading with China, all you can do with the money is leave it in a bank deposit or spend it in China. There is no large yuan-denominated bond market to invest in.
In addition to a bond market, you need the “plumbing” of a bond market.
This includes a network of primary dealers; hedging tools such as futures and options; financing tools such as repurchase agreements, derivatives, clearance, and settlement channels; and a good rule of law to settle disputes, secure creditors, and deal with bankruptcies.
China has none of these things on the needed scale or level of maturity. When it comes to true reserve currency status, the yuan is not ready for prime time.
China is also not ready to launch a gold-backed currency. Even if it has 10,000 tons of gold – far more than it currently admits, the market value of that gold is only about $385 billion.
China’s M1 money supply as of April 2015 is about $5.4 trillion. In other words, even on assumptions highly favorable to China, their gold is worth only about 7% of their money supply.
Historically, countries that want to run a successful gold standard need 20–40% of the money supply in gold in order to stand up to bank runs in the market.
China could reduce its money supply to get to the 20% level, but this would be extremely deflationary and throw the Chinese economy into a depression that would trigger political instability.
So that won’t happen. In short, China can’t have a reserve currency because it does not have a bond market, and it can’t have a gold-backed currency because it has nowhere near enough gold.
So what is China’s plan? China wants to do what the U.S. has done, which is to remain on a paper currency standard but make that currency important enough in world finance and trade to give China leverage over the behavior of other countries.
The best way to do that is to increase its voting power at the IMF and have the yuan included in the IMF basket for determining the value of the special drawing right.
Getting those two things requires the approval of the United States because the U.S. has veto power over important changes at the IMF. The U.S. can stand in the way of Chinese ambitions. The result is a kind of grand bargain in which China will get the IMF status it wants, but the U.S. will force China to be on its best behavior in return.
This means that China must keep the yuan pegged to the dollar at or near the current level. It also means that China can have gold but can’t talk about it. In order to “join the club,” China must play by club rules. The rules of the game say you need a lot of gold to play, but you don’t recognize the gold or discuss it publicly. Above all, you do not treat gold as money, even though gold has always been money.
The members of the club keep their gold handy just in case, but otherwise, they publicly disparage it and pretend it has no role in the international monetary system.
China will be expected to do the same. It’s important to note that China will not act in the best interests of gold investors; it will act in the best interests of China.
Moreover, just because the grand bargain is in sight does not mean it will be easy to realize. Both sides are jockeying for leverage. Beijing launched its own development bank to put pressure on the IMF.
The U.S. Treasury blames the tea party for delays in approving China’s new votes at the IMF.
Meanwhile, the White House does nothing to break the logjam in Congress. The White House is happy to let China twist in the wind while the game goes on behind closed doors. Meanwhile, China will probably announce its increased gold holdings later this year.
But don’t expect fireworks. China has three accounts where it keeps gold – the People’s Bank of China, PBOC; the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, SAFE; and the China Investment Corp., CIC.
China can move enough gold to PBOC when it is ready and report that to the IMF for purposes of allowing the yuan in the SDR. Meanwhile, it can still hide gold in SAFE and CIC until it needs it in the future. China will also probably be admitted into the SDR basket later this year.
Far from launching its own gold-backed currency, China will be acknowledging that the SDR is the true world money as far as the major powers are concerned.
Why would China want to give up on fiat money any more than the Fed or the European Central Bank?
All central banks prefer paper money to gold because they can print the paper kind. Why give up on that monopoly of power?
Gold is still the safest asset, and every investor should have some in his portfolio. The price of gold will go significantly higher in the years ahead. But contrary to what you read in the blogs, gold won’t go higher because China is confronting the U.S. or launching a gold-backed currency.
It will go higher when all central banks, China’s and the U.S.’s included, confront the next global liquidity crisis, worse than the one in 2008, and individual citizens stampede into gold to preserve wealth in a world that has lost confidence in all central banks. When that happens, physical gold may not be available at all.
The time to build your personal gold reserve is now. P.S. There is a new way to use monetary distortions to your financial advantage. Jim developed a proprietary system he calls “IMPACT” to teach ordinary investors how to profit by as much as 1,000% from the seesawing in global currency markets.
Best of all, you don’t need to invest in the forex market or the stock market or do anything risky like sell covered calls.
Following are member comments / feedback from TNT:
Vbeam: Once again we see that because of China's internal system of government and controlled banking it simply is un able to create a fiat based Yuan with a "global perceived value". The fiat based U.S. dollar has a global perceived value that is accepted world wide as a medium of exchange while the Yuan has not.
Creating an asset based currency on gold (for any country) is not possible today since there simply isn't enough gold to do it. In other words any country that is amassing a gold reserve for the backing of their currency can not achieve a "global perceived value" of their currency without having enough gold on deposit to back the printed notes. Enter Iraq.
However a country like Iraq, that has huge natural resource reserves, does have the ability to asset base their currency and not worry about the supply problem (at least for the near future). Notes based on gold reserves are worthless unless there exists physical gold on deposit to back them up. Iraq has oil futures and the ability to back their currency with it.
BurbankLou: Great post. Thank you. Rickards book is great but this info is not included in his book.
I might add that monetarily, China is always criticized for undervaluing its currency for trade purposes. An officially gold backed currency would increase its value and decrease its exports. That would contradict China's economic model.
China also has a shadow banking system that is huge and not subject to banking regulation and teetering on insolvency. Many expect it to collapse in the next international financial crises that Rickards refers to in the article.
Big E 13B: Come October China will have to declare how much gold it has if it want's reserve status but the real question is if they will declare all of it.
His new book is called The Big Drop and Impact is impressive.
Note: this not to be construed as advertisement it's my option.
K Boom: Rickards states in the article: "Far from launching its own gold-backed currency, China will be acknowledging that the SDR is the true world money as far as the major powers are concerned.
Why would China want to give up on fiat money any more than the Fed or the European Central Bank?
All central banks prefer paper money to gold because they can print the paper kind. Why give up on that monopoly of power?"
He is missing a couple of key points here. I agree that China will not be- nor are they attempting to be- the lone dog here, and are striving to be included in the SDR basket which will REPLACE the USD Petro-Dollar as current hegemon. BUT I believe the new SDR basket WILL in fact be asset-backed. ‘
And while technically he may be correct that " the central banks PREFER Paper Fiat" - that is the CORE of the global financial problem that needs fixing.
How many times over the past decade plus have we heard that this system is unsustainable? How was it fixed after the 08-09 meltdown? It wasn't!
The other point Rickards fails to note here re China- They are the largest creditor of the US. I think they had held 3t of our bonds? I could be wrong on that number, but for the sake of discussion, it is a factor.
The USA has printed money aka 'monetized its debt' with abandon- QE 1,2,3... This action has diluted China's 'investment' in America while the added injury to insult, the US has sufferred virtually little to no inflationary effects.
The US has offshored its inflation. China- BRICS- and the rest of the world are in a position to do something about that. I believe they are. I believe Rickards missing these key points makes him dead wrong on his entire premise.
Logos12: K Boom, here is a link that I found easily through google, it shows just how out of whack perceptions can get without even an attempt at research:
It even amazed me to find out that Japan has now surpassed China as the largest foreign hold of U.S. debt, but it appears that we are still mostly funded domestically:
"The U.S. debt is more than $18 trillion. Most headlines focus on how much the U.S. owes China, which is one of the largest foreign owners. However, the biggest owner is actually the Social Security Trust Fund, aka your retirement money. How does that work, and what does it mean?"
"What About Foreign Ownership of the Debt?
In February 2015, Japan beat China as the largest holder, at $1.224 trillion. China decreased its holdings to $1.224 trillion from its November 2013 peak of $1.317 trillion. Both Japan and China want to keep the value of the dollar high when compared to their currencies. "
K Boom: THanks Logos- Good article! So- of our 18trillion- 6+ t is held by foreign nations. BUT the more telling piece is the staggering amount 'owed' to other federal agencies!!
Talk about the ultimate Ponzi Scheme! LMAO- but not funny. DeFacto bankrupt! SSA- kaput. The term unfunded liabilities takes on new meaning. They've been masterful at kicking the can for decades now. Because nobody was in a position to put a stop to it. Until now.
Taxmom: I'm curious K Boom. Who is in a position to stop the madness? And how are they going to do it?